Colombo handles 5.2 million TEUs, JNPT handles 4.5 million TEUs, all ports in India together handle just about 8 million TEU
Meanwhile Chinese ports occupy 7 spots in the top 10 list. These 7 together handle 131 million TEUs. The Colombo International Container Terminal (CICT)—a joint venture between China’ Merchant Holding International and the Sri Lanka Port Authority, in 85:15 proportion of equity sharing—has been a remarkable success
The Colombo International Container Terminal (CICT)—a joint venture between China’ Merchant Holding International and the Sri Lanka Port Authority, in 85:15 proportion of equity sharing—has been a remarkable success. On efficiency parameters, the port is now among the top 50 ports in the world, and is the leading port in the South Asia region. The key success of the port has been to develop as a major trans-shipment hub on the Indian Ocean. By being a deep-water terminal and with the capacity of handling the largest containers, the port has become a berthing favourite for ultra-large and very-large container carriers, which account for significant parts of container volumes in the port. The new port city will build on the success of the Colombo port. By creating new capacities, including on-land maritime real estate like a marina and new housing, the port city can well make Sri Lanka one of the busiest hubs on the Indian Ocean. The prospects have significant implications for the MSRI and India.
TOP 50 WORLD CONTAINER PORTS
Rank
|
Port
|
Volume 2015 (Million TEU)
|
Volume 2014 (Million TEU)
|
Volume 2013 (Million TEU)
|
Volume 2012 (Million TEU)
|
Volume 2011 (Million TEU)
|
Website
|
1
|
Shanghai, China
|
36.54
|
35.29
|
33.62
|
32.53
|
31.74
|
|
2
|
SIngapore
|
30.92
|
33.87
|
32.6
|
31.65
|
29.94
|
|
3
|
Shenzhen, China
|
24.20
|
24.03
|
23.28
|
22.94
|
22.57
|
|
4
|
Ningbo-Zhoushan, China
|
20.63
|
19.45
|
17.33
|
16.83
|
14.72
|
|
5
|
Hong Kong, S.A.R., China
|
20.07
|
22.23
|
22.35
|
23.12
|
24.38
|
|
6
|
Busan, South Korea
|
19.45
|
18.65
|
17.69
|
17.04
|
16.18
|
|
7
|
Qingdao, China
|
17.47
|
16.62
|
15.52
|
14.50
|
13.02
|
|
8
|
Guangzhou Harbor, China
|
17.22
|
16.16
|
15.31
|
14.74
|
14.42
|
|
9
|
Jebel Ali, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
|
15.60
|
15.25
|
13.64
|
13.30
|
13.00
|
|
10
|
Tianjin, China
|
14.11
|
14.05
|
13.01
|
12.30
|
11.59
|
|
11
|
Rotterdam, Netherlands
|
12.23
|
12.30
|
11.62
|
11.87
|
11.88
|
|
12
|
Port Klang, Malaysia
|
11.89
|
10.95
|
10.35
|
10.00
|
9.60
|
|
13
|
Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China
|
10.26
|
10.59
|
9.94
|
9.78
|
9.64
|
|
14
|
Antwerp, Belgium
|
9.65
|
8.98
|
8.59
|
8.64
|
8.66
|
|
15
|
Dalian, China
|
9.45
|
10.13
|
10.86
|
8.92
|
6.40
|
|
16
|
Xiamen, China
|
9.18
|
8.57
|
8.01
|
7.20
|
6.47
|
|
17
|
Tanjung Pelepas, Malaysia
|
9.10
|
8.50
|
7.63
|
7.70
|
7.50
|
|
18
|
Hamburg, Germany
|
8.82
|
9.73
|
9.30
|
8.89
|
9.01
|
|
19
|
Los Angeles, U.S.A.
|
8.16
|
8.33
|
7.87
|
8.08
|
7.94
|
|
20*
|
Keihin Ports, Japan
|
7.52
|
7.85
|
7.81
|
7.85
|
7.64
|
|
21
|
Long Beach, U.S.A.
|
7.19
|
6.82
|
6.73
|
6.05
|
6.06
|
|
22
|
Laem Chabang, Thailand
|
6.82
|
6.58
|
6.04
|
5.93
|
5.73
|
|
23
|
New York-New Jersey, U.S.A.
|
6.37
|
5.77
|
5.47
|
5.53
|
5.50
|
|
24
|
Yingkou, China
|
5.92
|
5.77
|
5.30
|
4.85
|
4.03
|
|
25
|
Bremen/Bremerhaven, Germany
|
5.48
|
5.78
|
5.84
|
6.13
|
5.92
|
|
26
|
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
|
5.31
|
6.39
|
5.96
|
5.19
|
4.53
|
|
27
|
Tanjung Priok, Jakarta, Indonesia
|
5.20
|
5.77
|
5.47
|
5.53
|
5.50
|
|
28
|
Colombo, Sri Lanka
|
5.19
|
4.91
|
4.31
|
4.26
|
4.26
|
|
29
|
Suzhou, China
|
5.10
|
4.45
|
5.31
|
--
|
--
|
|
30
|
Lianyungun, China
|
5.01
|
5.01
|
5.49
|
5.02
|
4.85
|
|
31**
|
Hanshin Ports, Japan
|
4.93
|
5.32
|
5.32
|
5.00
|
4.80
|
|
32
|
Valencia, Spain
|
4.62
|
4.44
|
4.33
|
4.47
|
4.33
|
|
33
|
Algerciras Bay, Spain
|
4.52
|
4.56
|
4.50
|
4.11
|
3.60
|
|
34
|
Jawaharlal Nehru, India
|
4.49
|
4.45
|
4.12
|
4.26
|
4.32
|
|
35
|
Manila, Philippines
|
4.23
|
3.65
|
3.77
|
3.71
|
3.46
|
|
36
|
Jeddah, Suadi Arabia
|
4.19
|
4.20
|
4.56
|
4.74
|
4.01
|
|
37
|
Felixstowe, U.K.
|
4.00
|
4.00
|
3.74
|
3.95
|
3.74
|
|
38
|
Haiphong, Vietnam
|
3.87
|
3.45
|
3.02
|
.96
|
1.01
|
|
39
|
Santos, Brazil
|
3.78
|
3.68
|
3.45
|
3.17
|
2.99
|
|
40
|
Georgia Ports, U.S.A.
|
3.74
|
3.35
|
3.03
|
2.97
|
2.94
|
|
41
|
Port Said East, Egypt
|
3.60
|
3.40
|
3.12
|
2.86
|
3.20
|
|
42
|
Colon, Panama
|
3.58
|
3.29
|
3.36
|
3.52
|
3.37
|
|
43***
|
Seattle-Tacoma NW Seaport Alliance, U.S.A.
|
3.53
|
3.43
|
3.46
|
3.51
|
3.59
|
|
44
|
Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
|
3.40
|
4.12
|
4.12
|
400
|
3.23
|
|
45
|
Piraeus, Greece
|
3.37
|
3.59
|
3.16
|
--
|
--
|
|
46
|
Balboa, Panama
|
3.29
|
3.47
|
3.19
|
3.30
|
3.23
|
|
47
|
Tanjung Perak, Surabaya, Indonesia
|
3.12
|
3.13
|
3.02
|
2.89
|
2.64
|
|
48
|
Ambarli, Turkey
|
3.09
|
3.38
|
3.38
|
3.10
|
2.69
|
|
49
|
Marsaxlokk, Malta
|
3.06
|
2.90
|
2.75
|
2.54
|
2.36
|
|
50
|
Vancouver, Canada
|
3.05
|
2.91
|
2.83
|
2.72
|
|
**Keihin Ports is Japan's superport hub on the Tokyo Bay and includes Yokohama, Kawasaki, and Tokyo.
**Hanshin Ports is Japan's superport hub on the Osaka Bay and includes Kobe, Lsaka, Sakai-Semboku and Amafasaki-Nishinomiya-Ashiya.
***In October of 2014 the Port of Tacoma and Port of Seattle announced an agreement to opperate jointly.
Note: Represents total port throughput, included loaded and empty TEU.
Source data: The Journal of Commerce annual top 50 World Container Ports, Lloyd's List annual Top 100 Ports, AAPA World Port Rankings, Drewry World Container Traffic Port Handling and individual port websites.
Note: Represents total port throughput, included loaded and empty TEU.
Source data: The Journal of Commerce annual top 50 World Container Ports, Lloyd's List annual Top 100 Ports, AAPA World Port Rankings, Drewry World Container Traffic Port Handling and individual port websites.
Source: worldshipping.org
No comments:
Post a Comment